<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada&#8217;s an urban nation. Why is our literature still down on the farm?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/</link>
	<description>Full print edition content of This Magazine, Canada&#039;s most venerable publication of progressive politics, culture, and ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:18:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fuck the (CanLit) Farm Novel? &#171; Scrawled in Wax</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuck the (CanLit) Farm Novel? &#171; Scrawled in Wax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-491</guid>
		<description>[...] know there are some Canadian Literature nerds who occasionally read this blog, so&#8230; Is CanLit too rural? My initial response to this was &#8220;Yes! God, yes!&#8221; &#8211; until I remembered that I may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know there are some Canadian Literature nerds who occasionally read this blog, so&#8230; Is CanLit too rural? My initial response to this was &#8220;Yes! God, yes!&#8221; &#8211; until I remembered that I may [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJJ</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>JJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Perhaps he&#039;s also forgetting that the largest urban centres of Canada are uninspiring dumps. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps he&#039;s also forgetting that the largest urban centres of Canada are uninspiring dumps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-480</guid>
		<description>oops, I apparently can&#039;t write either! 24 CanLit classics in 12 months... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, I apparently can&#039;t write either! 24 CanLit classics in 12 months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-479</guid>
		<description>You would have a field day with my list of books for my new adventure:  reading 24 CanLit classics in 12 books.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would have a field day with my list of books for my new adventure:  reading 24 CanLit classics in 12 books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. L. Wagner</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>B. L. Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Wow!  The author certainly doesn&#039;t *get* the spiritual connection to land, eh?  Too bad. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  The author certainly doesn&#039;t *get* the spiritual connection to land, eh?  Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-476</guid>
		<description>I agree more or less with this piece. It&#039;s ironic that much of Canada&#039;s french literature lives in an urban place. Of course, there are stories from the farm and the agrarian past but the majority of books in QueLit are modern, contemporary and urban. My own writing has been called &quot;urban&quot; and I&#039;m pretty sure it was used an epithet. The idea of Canada in literature is struggling under the weight of Atwood&#039;s own &quot;Survival&quot; - and the previous commenter may have singled out Douglas Coupland, but he has never considered himself CanLit and if you ask him, most of the CanLit establishment doesn&#039;t consider him CanLit either. Another fabulous writer you can add to this: Timothy Taylor. Also quite &quot;urban&quot; in a DeLillo-esque kind of way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree more or less with this piece. It&#8217;s ironic that much of Canada&#8217;s french literature lives in an urban place. Of course, there are stories from the farm and the agrarian past but the majority of books in QueLit are modern, contemporary and urban. My own writing has been called &#8220;urban&#8221; and I&#8217;m pretty sure it was used an epithet. The idea of Canada in literature is struggling under the weight of Atwood&#8217;s own &#8220;Survival&#8221; &#8211; and the previous commenter may have singled out Douglas Coupland, but he has never considered himself CanLit and if you ask him, most of the CanLit establishment doesn&#8217;t consider him CanLit either. Another fabulous writer you can add to this: Timothy Taylor. Also quite &#8220;urban&#8221; in a DeLillo-esque kind of way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominique</title>
		<link>http://this.org/magazine/2009/09/18/canadian-farm-literature/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://this.org/magazine/?p=686#comment-475</guid>
		<description>You seem to be ignoring Mordechai Richler (streets of Montreal), Robertson Davies (hardly a rural maven), Kim Moritsugu, Joan Barfoot, Douglas Coupland (not much of a farm boy either) and countless others. Last I read, Oryx and Crake, from Margaret Atwood, didn&#039;t have a single chicken in it either. I think you&#039;re being overly selective. Or you haven&#039;t been reading the same CanLit that many awards juries have. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be ignoring Mordechai Richler (streets of Montreal), Robertson Davies (hardly a rural maven), Kim Moritsugu, Joan Barfoot, Douglas Coupland (not much of a farm boy either) and countless others. Last I read, Oryx and Crake, from Margaret Atwood, didn&#039;t have a single chicken in it either. I think you&#039;re being overly selective. Or you haven&#039;t been reading the same CanLit that many awards juries have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
